Transparency and Accountability Differences in SAM

SAM reporting demonstrates clear differences in transparency and accountability requirements between prime recipients and subrecipients. Prime recipients must report all subawards exceeding $30,000 by month-end following award dates, while subrecipients have no direct reporting obligations in SAM.gov. Non-compliance consequences are stricter for prime recipients, potentially resulting in fund suspension. The 2025 SAM.gov integration eliminates navigation between systems, implements automated validation checks, and requires complete entity registration before award consideration. Additional details reveal the full compliance framework.

Key Changes in SAM Reporting Requirements for 2025

integrated subaward reporting system

While the shift to integrated reporting systems has been ongoing for several years, the full integration of subaward reporting into SAM.gov represents one of the most significant changes for federal contractors in 2025.

The consolidation creates a single-platform approach for both prime and subprime award management, eliminating the need to navigate between FSRS.gov and SAM.gov.

The new system implements automated data validation checks during subaward entry, reducing errors and streamlining the reporting process. Contractors must now complete all Core Data, Assertions, and Representations sections before award consideration, with real-time TIN validation through the SAM.gov consent process.

For subaward management, the unified interface offers batch reporting capabilities for organizations handling multiple subcontractors.

The system maintains thorough audit trail functionality, allowing contractors to track modifications and submission history while ensuring compliance with the updated FAR 52.204-7 requirements implemented in November 2024.

This evolution of SAM.gov continues to fulfill its mission as a centralized platform for all government procurement activities, enhancing transparency between government agencies and private sector vendors.

Understanding the $30,000 Threshold for Award Transparency

30 000 subaward reporting threshold

The $30,000 threshold represents a fundamental benchmark in federal award transparency requirements within the SAM.gov ecosystem. This figure establishes when subawards become subject to mandatory reporting, triggered at the time of obligation rather than disbursement.

Importantly, threshold compliance operates on a cumulative basis, meaning multiple modifications that collectively exceed $30,000 will activate reporting requirements.

Key Considerations:

  1. Once triggered, reporting obligations remain even if subsequent de-obligations reduce funding below $30,000.
  2. Natural persons receiving awards remain exempt regardless of amount.
  3. Organizations with under $300,000 in gross annual income qualify for reporting exemptions.

Reporting must occur within 30 days following the obligation month through the FFATA Sub-Award Reporting System exclusively.

Entities cannot circumvent these requirements by dividing larger projects into smaller contracts, as the system tracks cumulative obligations across an award’s lifecycle.

Working with legitimate registration services can help ensure your organization maintains compliance with these transparency requirements while avoiding potential scams and unnecessary fees.

Prime vs. Sub-recipient Reporting Responsibilities in SAM

prime vs sub recipient reporting

Federal award management creates distinct reporting pathways for prime recipients and subrecipients within the SAM.gov ecosystem. Prime recipients bear the primary burden, guaranteeing all subawards exceeding $30,000 are reported by month-end following the award date. They must capture FAIN numbers, funding amounts, and project descriptions within SAM.gov’s reporting interface. This centralized approach leverages SAM as a verification platform for subrecipient eligibility throughout the award lifecycle.

Subrecipient obligations differ greatly, as they have no direct SAM.gov reporting duties. Instead, subrecipients must maintain accurate documentation and supply required information to prime recipients upon request. This includes entity details, executive compensation data (if not SAM-registered), and award documentation. Some organizations choose to employ third-party services to navigate the complexities of registration and compliance requirements.

The compliance consequences vary by role. Prime recipients face possible fund suspension for reporting failures, while subrecipients risk payment delays or contract termination if they fail to provide necessary information.

This two-tier system guarantees transparency while keeping reporting burdens manageable through clear responsibility allocation between award participants.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Does SAM Handle Foreign Sub-Recipients With Transparency Requirements?

SAM handles foreign sub-recipients by requiring them to register and obtain a Unique Entity Identifier before receiving federal funds.

Foreign compliance demands that sub-recipients follow FFATA guidelines, which mandate reporting of all subawards of $30,000 or greater.

Reporting standards include providing access to research documentation at least annually, particularly for NIH-funded projects.

This system guarantees transparency in international funding while maintaining national security through consistent monitoring and documentation of foreign research partnerships.

Can Reporting Deadlines Be Extended in Special Circumstances?

SAM offers reporting flexibility to accommodate special circumstances affecting organizations.

The system allows deadline extensions based on technical issues, administrative needs, or external factors that impact reporting processes. Users may request adjustments for unique organizational challenges, while some situations trigger automatic extensions of up to 30 days.

These accommodations help maintain compliance while reducing penalties for late submissions. The extension process typically requires proper documentation and follows established regulatory guidelines.

How Are Executive Compensation Disclosures Protected From Public Access?

Executive compensation disclosures maintain certain privacy protections despite public reporting requirements.

While general compensation data must be reported, personal details unrelated to pay remain private. Companies can withhold information that might create competitive disadvantages, such as specific business strategies.

Additionally, executive privacy concerns are balanced with compensation limits disclosure requirements. Sensitive personal data, including medical information and home addresses, receives protection under anti-discrimination laws and SEC regulations.

What Happens if Sub-Recipients Fail to Provide Required Information?

When sub-recipients fail to provide required information, prime recipients may implement several reporting consequences.

These include withholding federal funds, potentially terminating the subaward, and documenting the non-compliance.

Primary recipients must enforce compliance measures by issuing formal notifications about reporting obligations.

Additionally, the sub-recipient risks audit findings, legal penalties under FFATA, and jeopardizes their eligibility for future federal funding opportunities.

How Long Must Organizations Retain Documentation for SAM Reporting?

Organizations must retain documentation for SAM reporting for a minimum of three years from the final payment or transaction date, per federal requirements in 2 CFR §200 and 45 CFR §75.

Documentation retention periods may extend beyond three years if specified in contract clauses or agency policies.

While SAM maintains electronic exclusion records indefinitely, organizations should consult their specific federal agency’s reporting guidelines for paper record retention requirements, especially when audits or investigations are pending.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn